Which ADR method is explicitly mentioned as usable during DR proceedings?

Which ADR method is explicitly mentioned as usable during DR proceedings?

• A. Mediation
• B. Arbitration only
• C. Court-ordered fines
• D. Summary judgment

Answer: (A)

Mediation is the method highlighted here because DR proceedings explicitly permit using a neutral mediator to help parties reach a settlement without going to trial. Mediation focuses on cooperation and offers a confidential, voluntary route to resolve the dispute, which fits the goal of DR to settle efficiently and amicably. Arbitration is another ADR path, but it delivers a binding decision after a private hearing, and it isn’t described as an option explicitly usable within DR proceedings in the same way mediation is. Court-ordered fines and summary judgment aren’t ADR techniques at all; fines are punitive measures, and summary judgment is a court procedure to decide a claim without a full trial. So mediation best matches the scenario as the explicitly usable ADR option during DR proceedings.

Mediation is the method highlighted here because DR proceedings explicitly permit using a neutral mediator to help parties reach a settlement without going to trial. Mediation focuses on cooperation and offers a confidential, voluntary route to resolve the dispute, which fits the goal of DR to settle efficiently and amicably.

Arbitration is another ADR path, but it delivers a binding decision after a private hearing, and it isn’t described as an option explicitly usable within DR proceedings in the same way mediation is. Court-ordered fines and summary judgment aren’t ADR techniques at all; fines are punitive measures, and summary judgment is a court procedure to decide a claim without a full trial.

So mediation best matches the scenario as the explicitly usable ADR option during DR proceedings.